Archives
- 2016
- 2015
-
2014
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
-
January
-
Open fire
14/01/31
At the Creative Commons blog, there's discussion of a recent report by the U.S. PIRG Education Fund about the the impact of expensive textbooks. It documents something I had observed anecdotally in my own classes, that lots of students decide not to buy textbooks because of the cost and that th -
The old Mill run
14/01/28
The standard account, framed by Ian Hacking and promulgated by almost everyone, is that "natural kind" as a philosophical category goes back to Whewell and Mill in the 19th century. I debunk that account in a paper which has just been published in the The Journal of the History of Analytic -
There's a reason they call that guy "Hacker"
14/01/23
Following a link from Brian Leiter's blog, I happened upon an article in which Peter Hacker defends an old-school conception of philosophy.
As Hacker sees it, there are two things that philosophers might be doing:
The first is metaphysics, enquiry into "the essential, -
Collaboration in the key of d-cog
14/01/17
In the early days of this blog, I wrote a paper about distributed cognition in which I made use of earlier work by my colleague Ron McClamrock. Today I posted a draft, this time coauthored with Ron, which extends the earlier work.
The new paper: Friends with benefits! Hooking up the cogn -
A short item on natural kinds
14/01/10
One of the papers I was working on when I looked for places to send short papers has been accepted at Phil. Quarterly. I argue that the homeostatic property cluster account shouldn't be taken to define natural kinds, despite common misreadings which take it to do so.
Even the title i
-
Open fire
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- 2009
- 2008
- 2007
- 2006
- 2005