There are now three different on-line petitions, all directed at the editors of Synthese: Eric Schliesser has started two petitions.
Schliesser's first petition calls for the editors to allow Barbara Forrest the write a response to Francis Beckwith's response to her original paper. Her paper, recall, is the one that led the editors to apologize for the guest-edited issue of their own journal in the first place. In Beckwith's reply, he uses the editors' disclaimer as evidence that the original paper was incompetent!
Schliesser's second petition calls for the editors to explain how and why they allowed Beckwith to publish such a brazen reply.
The third petition, organized by Brian Leiter, demands that the editors retract the the disclaimer and apologize. Ingo Brigandt and Mohan Matthen provide strong arguments for signing it.
I have signed all three, although I worry that the grand buffet of petitions will dilute the appropriate outrage. One might object to Schliesser's first petition for procedural reasons, on the grounds that allowing Forrest a reponse would be the wrong form of redress, even if one thought that the editors well and truly cocked this up. Yet a weak showing for that petition might be taken as somehow vindicating the editors and Beckwith's response. Bleah.
I am still prepared to give mitigated support to a boycott of the journal, so petitions now are weak sauce. I'll sign them, though, and so should you.*
* Obviously, you shouldn't just sign them because I said you should. Follow some links. Read up on it. Then sign.
Update, 3May
Leiter's petition, which I think was the most important, has now closed. It will be delivered to the editors with roughly 470 signatures. Leiter provides a summary of signatories and comments.
[ add comment ] ( 5523 views ) | [ 0 trackbacks ] | permalink
<<First <Back | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | Next> Last>>